The model of Ma Ha Na (State Sangha Maha Nayaka Committee) is state-centric and reliant on the government; its utility and effectiveness therefore vary no less in function of political authorities and regime type. Contrary to the popular misconception, Ma Ba Tha (Patriotic Association of Myanmar), comprising both sangha and laity, never claimed to be a rival structure to Ma Ha Na and is even deferential to it. Both organizations now seem to be losing control of bigots and nationalists, mainly the ones being driven by explicit political agendas. In fact, Ma Ba Tha at the state level ceased to present itself--at least officially--as Ma Ba Tha, but became the Buddha-Dhamma Parahita Foundation. Ma Ba Tha probably was not responsible for most recent nationalist agitations either. Ironically, the villainization of Ma Ba Tha by prevailing ignorance in media and some segments of society further complicates the situation. This has not only consolidated existing polarized stances, but also provides raison d'être for contending camps to perpetuate their respective positions. That said, I do not see the need for Ma Ba Tha to remain as a major player at the state level. It is imperative that the Burmese state carefully redefine its relations with both the Buddhist clergy and peoples by avoiding externally-imposed pressures.